Tandem Satellite Mission Reveals a Thinner Lunar Crust

The first results from the GRAIL gravity-mapping mission suggest that the crust's average thickness is only 30 kilometers, not twice that as Apollo seismometers estimated

By Eugenie C. Scott and Eugenie Samuel Reich

The GRAIL mission so far has found little evidence for some hypothetical ancient impact basins. Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MIT

By Eugenie Samuel Reich of Nature magazine

A sneak peek at the first results from a NASA mission to measure the Moon?s gravitational field hints at a lunar crust that is only half as thick as once thought.

There were a few gasps among scientists in the audience at a 13 September seminar at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as they took in the data revealed by Maria Zuber, principal investigator for NASA?s Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission. Zuber, a planetary scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, showed a crisp, high-resolution gravitational map made with data collected by GRAIL?s twin spacecraft between March and June of this year.

?We are three to four times better in resolution compared to Kaguya and Lunar Prospector,? said Zuber, referring to two previous missions that mapped the Moon's gravitational field. GRAIL?s results have not yet been published or released publicly by NASA, and Zuber was not at liberty to give an interview.

Yet her talk, and the thrilled reactions from those present at the seminar and others interviewed by Nature, suggest that GRAIL is poised to have a profound effect on scientists? understanding of the origins and early evolution of the Moon when its results are released in the coming weeks.

GRAIL?s two probes, named Ebb and Flow by schoolchildren in a NASA competition, were launched in September 2011 (see ?Twins to Probe Moon?s Heart?). The first probe began orbiting the Moon on 31 December 2011, with the second joining the next day. By March, they had begun detailed mapping. The two spacecraft exchange radio signals, recording fluctuations in their relative positions that are then used to reveal tiny accelerations and decelerations caused by variations in the Moon?s gravitational field. The average altitude of the primary mission was 55 kilometers ? much lower than the orbit used by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), a similar gravity-mapping mission for Earth that has to fly higher to avoid atmospheric friction. Occasionally, the GRAIL operations team brought the craft lower than 20 kilometers to further improve the resolution of the data. ?Nothing beats flying low,? says Zuber.

Zuber gave the packed auditorium a heads-up on three science results. The first is that the Moon?s crust seems to be thinner than thought. When lunar geologists first estimated the thickness of the Moon?s crust, using data from seismometers placed by the Apollo astronauts, they concluded that it was around 60 kilometers thick. Subsequent re-analyses of those data brought the estimate down to around 45 kilometers. Now, GRAIL?s results suggest that the crust?s average thickness is only 30 kilometers, says Zuber.

That piques the interest of Linda Elkins-Tanton, a planetary scientist at the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington DC. The Moon?s crust is thought to have formed when the mineral anorthosite crystallized and floated out of the ocean of magma on the body?s surface soon after it was formed out of a collision between the Earth and a giant asteroid. ?The crustal thickness is an amazingly evocative clue about the origin of the Moon,? says Elkins-Tanton.

She adds that researchers are more likely to be interested in the variations in crustal thickness seen by GRAIL, because lunar scientists are already challenged in explaining why its crust is much thicker on its far side than on its near side. Given an average thickness of 30 kilometers, the crust in some regions on the near side may be unexpectedly thin, which will be particularly difficult to model.

Source: http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=dc0e74043342213c16f5d4dabf369a80

baltimore county current tv megamillions ncaa basketball tournament 2012 megamillions winning numbers lotto winner michael oher